Site.nu
AI workflows

AI workflows for repetitive work your team still handles manually

Many teams want to use AI, but do not know where it is useful, safe, or worth the effort. We help you find repetitive knowledge work where AI can support the team without taking away control: requests, documents, internal questions, reviews, and follow-up.

In a 30 to 45 minute AI fit check, we look at which process is worth trying first, what the risks are, and how to start small. You get a practical next step, not an inspiration session full of hype.

Choose the right first process

Keep people in control

Start small, then improve

For teams that want practical AI, not hype

Which work is a good fit for AI

Not every process needs AI. This service fits repetitive knowledge work with reading, sorting, summarizing, checking, or follow-up. If the process follows fixed rules every time, normal automation is often the better choice.

Lots of repeated requests or documents

Similar questions, documents, tickets, or requests come in often and are still read, processed, or forwarded by hand.

Clear input and examples

There is enough context, documentation, or past work to explain what good output should look like.

Review remains possible

You want speed, but not at the expense of control. We design review, logging, and escalation into the flow.

What we can help automate

We start from a concrete process and use AI only where it helps. These use cases are often good candidates for a first pilot.

Intake and triage

Automatically summarize, classify, and route new requests, tickets, or internal asks into the right flow.

Document processing

Extract, structure, validate, and pass information from documents into the next step or system.

Knowledge assistants

Answer internal or external questions based on controlled sources, policies, manuals, or customer context.

Checks and review steps

Check text, output, or cases for completeness, tone, deviations, or missing information.

Follow-up tasks

Trigger actions after an event, such as sending summaries, creating tasks, or preparing follow-up questions.

Connections to existing tools

Connect AI output to existing tools while keeping visibility into errors, exceptions, and human intervention.

From process check to controlled rollout

We start with the process, the risk, and the desired outcome, not with a model or tool choice.

01

Process check and first use case

We analyze where repetitive knowledge work sits, how decisions are currently made, what data is available, and which risks need attention.

Pilot design and safety rules

We choose a promising flow and design prompts, decision logic, evaluation criteria, review moments, and system integrations.

Build, test, and validation

We build the workflow or agent, test with real examples, and improve for quality, reliability, and exception handling.

Rollout and ongoing control

After validation, we set up monitoring, feedback, versioning, and ongoing development so the solution remains useful in production.

AI workflow or traditional automation: which is right?

Use AI where interpretation is needed. Use rules-based automation when the process always follows fixed rules.

AI workflow automation

Best for text, documents, context, and support for human work

Traditional automation

Strong for fixed rules, fixed fields, and fully predictable processes

Handling unstructured input
Well suited to text, documents, context, and variable phrasing
Works best with fixed fields and fixed rules
Building in human review
Review and escalation can be an explicit part of the flow
Also possible, but without AI support on content and interpretation
Deterministic tasks
Not always necessary when the process is completely fixed
Often the best choice when rules are fully unambiguous
Using knowledge and context
Can use sources, instructions, and prior context
Limited without a lot of custom logic
Risk and governance
Manageable, but it requires explicit evaluation, logging, and guardrails
Less variation, but also less suited to interpretive work
Testing value quickly in a pilot
Strong when you want to validate a scoped use case first
Strong when the process is already tightly and predictably defined

Frequently asked questions

Answers about use-case selection, privacy, risk, and how to move from pilot to daily use.

Schedule an AI fit check for your process

In 30 to 45 minutes, we determine which process is worth trying first, what the risks are, and how to start small. You leave with a practical next step.

Briefly describe the repetitive work you want to improve

Schedule your session

  • A short live walkthrough of the platform and approach
  • Straight advice on what does and does not fit your situation
  • A concrete next step you can act on right away

Schedule an AI fit check

Tell us which process costs a lot of manual work, where many documents or requests come in, or where you think AI could help. We use this to prepare the call in a focused way.